Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji

Nikolić, Antun

prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji

Download
PDF 422.06 KB

master's thesis

Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji

Đakovo: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology, 2020. urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Nikolić, Antun

Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo
Department of Systematic Teology
Chair of Dogmatic Theology

Cite this document

APA 6th Edition

Nikolić, A. (2020). Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

MLA 8th Edition

Nikolić, Antun. "Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, 2020. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Chicago 17th Edition

Harvard

Nikolić, A. (2020). 'Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji', Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, accessed 28 March 2023, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Vancouver

Nikolić A. Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji [Master's thesis]. Đakovo: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo; 2020 [cited 2023 March 28] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

IEEE

A. Nikolić, "Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji", Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, Đakovo, 2020. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Cite this item: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:611756

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.

Metadata

Title	Izabrani suvremeni modeli tumačenja nauka o transupstancijaciji
Title (english)	Selected contemporary models of interpretation of the teaching of transubstantiation
Author	Antun Nikolić
Mentor	Boris Vulić (mentor)
Committee member	Vladimir Dugalić (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Committee member	Šimo Šokčević (član povjerenstva)
Committee member	Boris Vulić (član povjerenstva)
Granter	Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo (Department of Systematic Teology) (Chair of Dogmatic Theology) Đakovo
Defense date and country	2020-10-14, Croatia
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline	HUMANISTIC SCIENCES Theology Dogmatic Theology
Abstract	Euharistijsku teologiju bilo kojeg teologa možemo načelno smjestiti između dviju krajnosti: s jedne strane je krajnji realizam – potpuna istovjetnost između Kristova tijela i euharistijskih darova, a s druge strane je krajnji simbolizam – euharistijski darovi samo predstavljaju Kristovo tijelo. Cilj rada je protumačiti dogmu o transupstancijaciji, koja je bliža krajnosti realizma. Prvo proučavamo njen nastanak. Razvijana je u teološkim raspravama razvijenog srednjeg vijeka. Njeno vrhunsko filozofsko-teološko tumačenje dao je Toma Akvinski, a na Tridentskom saboru ona ima središnje mjestu u definiranju euharistijskog nauka. Nakon sabora malo je koji katolički teolog zastupao neku od spomenutih krajnosti. Napretkom znanosti u 20. st. pojam supstancije biva osporavan, što 60-ih godina rezultira raspravom o transupstancijacijskoj dogmi. U ovoj raspravi B. Welte, P. Schoonenberg i E. Schillebeeckx su teolozi sa simbolističkim tendencijama. Pritom se oslanjaju na personalističku filozofiju i na filozofiju Martina Heideggera. Među onima koji, unatoč znanstvenim spoznajama 20. st., uočavaju trajno važeću realističku srž proučavane dogme prikazujemo misli K. Rahnera, R. Spaemanna i J. Ratzingera.
Abstract (english)	The Eucharistic theology of any theologian can in principle be placed between two extremes: on the one hand is the ultimate realism - the complete identity between the body of Christ and the Eucharistic gifts, and on the other is the ultimate symbolism - the Eucharistic gifts only represent the body of Christ. The aim of this paper is to interpret the dogma of transubstantiation, which is closer to the extreme of realism. We first study its origin. It was developed in the theological treatises of the High Middle Ages. Its supreme philosophical-theological interpretation was given by st. Thomas Aquinas, and at the Council of Trent it has a central place in defining the Eucharistic doctrine. After the council, few Catholic theologians advocated any of the aforementioned extremes. With the advancement of science in the 20th century, the notion of substance was challenged, resulting in a discussion about transubstantiation dogma in the 1960s. In this discussion B. Welte, P. Schoonenberg, and E. Schillebeeckx are theologians with symbolist tendencies. In doing so, they rely on personalist philosophy and the philosophy of Martin Heidegger. Among those who, despite of the scientific knowledge of the 20th century, notice the permanently valid realistic core of the studied dogma, we present the thoughts of K. Rahner, R. Spaemann and J. Ratzinger.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Language	croatian
URN:NBN	urn:nbn:hr:120:611756
Study programme	Title: Study of Philosophy and Theology Study programme type: university Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate Academic / professional title: magistar/ magistra teologije (magistar/ magistra teologije)
Type of resource	Text
File origin	Born digital
Access conditions	Open access
Terms of use
Repository	Repository of the Chatolic Faculty of Theology
Created on	2020-10-19 06:57:36