Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje

Pašalić, Dino

prikaz prve stranice dokumenta Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje

Download
PDF 729.46 KB

master's thesis

Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje

varijante i formulacije kroz povijest

Đakovo: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology, 2016. urn:nbn:hr:120:801716

Pašalić, Dino

Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo
Department of Phylosophy and History
Chair of Philosophy

Cite this document

APA 6th Edition

Pašalić, D. (2016). Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje : varijante i formulacije kroz povijest (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:801716

MLA 8th Edition

Pašalić, Dino. "Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje : varijante i formulacije kroz povijest." Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, 2016. https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:801716

Chicago 17th Edition

Harvard

Pašalić, D. (2016). 'Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje : varijante i formulacije kroz povijest', Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, accessed 24 March 2023, https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:801716

Vancouver

Pašalić D. Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje : varijante i formulacije kroz povijest [Master's thesis]. Đakovo: Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo; 2016 [cited 2023 March 24] Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:801716

IEEE

D. Pašalić, "Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje : varijante i formulacije kroz povijest", Master's thesis, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo, Đakovo, 2016. Available at: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:801716

Cite this item: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:120:801716

Please login to the repository to save this object to your list.

Metadata

Title	Kozmološki arugmet za Božje postojanje : varijante i formulacije kroz povijest
Title (english)	The Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God : Variations and Formulations Throughout History
Author	Dino Pašalić
Mentor	Šimo Šokčević (mentor)
Committee member	Karlo Višaticki (predsjednik povjerenstva)
Granter	Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek Catholic Faculty of Theology in Djakovo (Department of Phylosophy and History) (Chair of Philosophy) Đakovo
Defense date and country	2016-09-16, Croatia
Scientific / art field, discipline and subdiscipline	HUMANISTIC SCIENCES Theology
Abstract	Kozmološki argument polazi od iskustva stvorenoga svijeta, te je stoga razumljiv većini ljudi. On počiva na iskustvu i spoznaji da sve stvari imaju svoj uzrok, da se gibaju, te da moraju imati razlog svoga postojanja. Ovim radom željeli smo prikazati glavne postavke najbitnijih inačica kozmološkog argumenta, kod kojeg možemo raspoznati dvije verzije: argument iz kauzalnosti i argument iz kontingentnosti. Prvi tvrdi kako je Bog početak uzročnog lanca, dok drugi u Bogu vidi objašnjenje svijeta, odnosno svih kontingentnih stvari. Kauzalni argument obradit ćemo u kontekstu misli Tome Akvinskog, dok ćemo argument iz kontingentnosti prikazati kroz prizmu Leibnizove verzije, koja počiva na principu dovoljnog razloga, te verzije Galea i Prussa, koja počiva na slabom principu dovoljnog razloga. Na kraju smo prikazali induktivni argument Richarda Swinburnea koji je baziran na principu vjerojatnosti.
Abstract (english)	The cosmological argument starts from the experience of the created world, and is therefore understandable to most people. The argument is based on the experience and understanding that everything has it's cause, that it moves, and needs an explanation for it's existence. With this work, we aimed to demonstrate the main settings of the most crucial versions of the cosmological argument, which has two main versions: the argument from causality and the argument from contingency. The first one claims that God is the first cause of the causal chain, and the second one acknowledges God as the ultimate explanation of all contingent things. The argument from causality will be depicted in the context of the work of Thomas Aquinas, whereas the argument from contingency will be shown through the prism of Leibniz's version, which is based on the principle of sufficient reason, and the Gale-Pruss's version, which is based on the weak principle of sufficient reason. Finally, we tried to demonstrate Richard Swinburne's inductive cosmological argument, which is constructed on the principle of probability.
Keywords
Keywords (english)
Language	croatian
URN:NBN	urn:nbn:hr:120:801716
Study programme	Title: Study of Philosophy and Theology Study programme type: university Study level: integrated undergraduate and graduate Academic / professional title: magistar/ magistra teologije (magistar/ magistra teologije)
Type of resource	Text
File origin	Born digital
Access conditions	Open access
Terms of use
Repository	Repository of the Chatolic Faculty of Theology
Created on	2016-09-30 07:43:53